Feeds:
Artikel
Kommentare
ALAN KENT
HONG KONG
January 18th, 2010
1:33 pm
Germany calls it “tradition” yet what this system was set up for was CHILD LABOR factories farms etc.. it had nothing to do with the “mothers” being best for the children’s education it had all to do with EXPLOITING children for MONEY.
the reality of the modern working environment calls for ALL DAY school with after school extra curricular activities which keep children off the streets and in positive educational environments.
the literacy rate of 15 yr olds does not surprise me at all even educated germans do not know much beyond their very NARROW SPECIALIZED degree areas, they do not focus on a world view of education or even teach children how to develop the mind so they can think for themselves, it is a lock step culture.
that’s why the west developed and Germany has stagnated culturally.
any glance at german television gives you multiple channels of topless women hosting really distasteful quiz shows such is the attitude of misogyny in Germany
BTW this article has set off an UPROAR on TOY TOWN the English language web site in Germany
Über diesen Kommentar musste ich am meisten lachen.
Prof Slobodan Lang, MD, FRCH
Zagreb, Croatia
January 18th, 2010
1:33 pm
I admire Ms. Merkel as a great European leader. In her honor I will tell you a short story. In 1989 We had a Healthy Cities meeting in West Berlin devoted to green urban policy. Those were the days of tearing the Wall. We were among the first to cross and spent the first night with women of East Berlin. I was so fascinated that they did got rid of that wall in a Gandhian style, that I told these women: ‘You will be admired forever. You women united Berlin peacuefully’. Women replied: ‘Doctor, you are so naive. In twenty years nobody will remember or mention us. We did it not to be famous, but to unable better life for our children’. They were right, but nevertheless in defending of Dubrovnik, speaking for peace in the Balkans, on a White Way in Bosnia and Herzegovina, we relied on women. Six month ago I got a granddaughter, and gave her a name Hana, because of my love and admiration for Hanna Arendt, who was not free to have a country, home, family and child. She left love to all of us, and now in the 21st century a small Hanna is looking at me with her big eyes, and I love her and hope. We need women. Thank you for starting this series. We will use it. I also admire Habermas for communication and Brandt for kneeling. Woman for leadership, men for communication and kneeling. In Jewish faith there are always 37 just men, but the problem is that we don’t know who they are, and they don’t know it. In Europe (not just Europe) there are other walls to bring down for a better life of our children, of my Hana.
Philadelphia
January 18th, 2010
1:33 pm
I worked for a small German company in the US for three years. The German managers were shocked and mortified when, after 2 months of maternity leave, I returned to work. Their belligerent attitudes persisted until I was forced to leave. Thank you for providing a broader cultural context for their perspective.
cw
washington dc
January 18th, 2010
3:56 pm
Very interesting reading…I lived in Germany a total of eight years (Berlin, Karlsruhe, Heidelberg, 1985-2002) as an Army officer’s wife. All my children attended German schools at one time or another.

From those experiences, I was struck by a number of issues, one being that the half-day Gymnasium that my daughters attended just wasn’t that great. Teachers worked exact contract hours only, were indifferent as to whether students were actively engaged in learning, and did nothing to intervene in the bullying of the very few Turkish students who had been admitted to Gymnasium. Teachers’ attitudes seemed to be: You don’t like it here? Then go to the Realschule (a non-university track school). If a teacher was sick? There wasn’t class that day (that’s in elementary school, too). There’s no substitute teacher system. Consequently it doesn’t surprise me at all to hear that German schools are not up to par.

Secondly, it was unbelievable to me how difficult it was for a German woman with children to have a job. School was from 8:00-1:00, no lunch served. If the teacher was absent they just sent the students home, no phone call home. After all, Mom’s at home! Store hours were nuts: grocery stores open from 8:00-1:00, 2:00-6:00, Saturdays morning only, Sunday closed. It seemed like for women, Germany was frozen in time, around 1953 or so.

I am so glad to hear that German women will finally have full-day schools for their children, so they can have some semblance of normalcy and can return to the workplace. Apparently too store opening hours have become more liberal as well. I am happy for my German friends who stood on their heads to juggle a job (usually part-time) and their child-rearing responsibilities.

Mohamed
USA
January 18th, 2010
3:56 pm
One last point, if a Muslim woman takes care of her children and stay home, she must be oppressed. If a German women do it then we read about it in New York Times and try to understand the merit.
Register to recommend a comment.’, -10, 90);dcsMultiTrack(‘DCS.dcssip’,'www.nytimes.com’,'DCS.dcsuri’,'/article comments/rec.html’,'WT.ti’,'Article Comments Rec’,'WT.z_aca’,'Rec’,'WT.gcom’,'Com’);return false;”>Recommend  Recommended by 14 Readers
tokyo
January 19th, 2010
2:11 pm
Even though I’m half German myself, I can’t stand the neurotic, uptight culture or the personalities it creates. Boorish, dismissive, charmless, over-achievers. I think the only reason Germans try so hard is so they can get far enough “ahead” of other people to self-justify the right to be insufferably smug. Did I miss “opinionated”? I did, sorry…
Lieselotte
Northern California
January 19th, 2010
3:12 pm
@ nvieze2000: I’m sorry, but I don’t think you know what you are talking about! I grew up in East Germany and will not defend early indoctrination that indeed took place, starting in first grade when you became a “Young Pioneer,” but it certainly didn’t happen in Kinderkrippe (ages 1-3) or Kindergarten (ages 4-6/7.)
Believe me, none of my daycare “aunties” spied on me or ratted me out to the Stasi for going on and on about West German children’s TV programs (which we were officially not allowed to see.) We were certainly not turned against our parents or made into toddler communists, that’s just silly.

Only now, as an adult without children and living in the US, do I realize how fantastic the childcare system in East Germany was – all politics aside. We were fed well, had milk and afternoon naps every day, tons of outdoor activities, small group sizes and lots of educational games that parents would never have the stamina to play every day! Plus both my parents could work and had more or less fulfilling careers.

So why is it important now what the motives and reasons behind this setup were? Why can’t (Western) governments take a closer look at this model and without having to subsidize it quite so heavily (it was almost free in East Germany) start implementing it step by step? I can guarantee centers like that would fill very quickly and give women a lot more options. These are things I would like to see my tax dollars used for, not on wars…

I continue to be disappointed by many West German states which took no interest, or even were arrogant, about this proven system right under their nose. Instead of moving towards a more equal treatment of women, the morals and ideas of many Southwesterners (Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria) seem to be stuck in the 1950s… Women with children must demand that more be done!

Register to recommend a comment.’, -10, 90);dcsMultiTrack(‘DCS.dcssip’,'www.nytimes.com’,'DCS.dcsuri’,'/article comments/rec.html’,'WT.ti’,'Article Comments Rec’,'WT.z_aca’,'Rec’,'WT.gcom’,'Com’);return false;”>Recommend  Recommended by 14 Readers
fly-over mom
Central IL
January 19th, 2010
3:14 pm
Interesting articles and some very good comments! As someone who has followed this debate from both sides of the Atlantic, I’d like to add one more observation. Hidden in the low labor force participation of women with children is the ticking time bomb of these women’s low retirement benefits in the decades to come. Germany has been chipping away at the its defined benefit pension system and for a comfortable retirement two pensions plus private savings will be necessary for a couple in the near future. Stay at home mothers with a couple of decades of very part time work after the kids are grown are looking at a very meager future on their golden years.
MB
Canada
January 19th, 2010
3:16 pm

Very interesting article. Speaking with my Chinese friends, they are always astonished how hard life is for mothers in the West (in Canada – home of 52 weeks of half-pay parental leave!). They tell me that in China, all the childcare is done by the grandparents so that the younger adults can work hard while they are able….In fact, that’s the case in most of the world. The stories about the glory and singular value of the stay-at-home mom I think are just so much wishful thinking by people who find the flux of the raucous extended family somehow aggravating to contemplate.

Good for Germany for working on these changes – it will free up the talents of mothers, help fathers become more known and loved by their kids, and help immigrants integrate. It might even increase the birth rate of the often great German people.

Frank Barry
SLO, CA
January 19th, 2010
3:16 pm
It’s about time we faced up to the fact that women are becoming masculine. Perhaps Mother Nature is saying ‘Stop with the baby making before you all starve to death..

Pretty far out thinking, but stranger things happen..

Jennifer
Southampton, NY
January 19th, 2010
3:18 pm
Basically the article is confirming that Germany is still in the business of discrimination and they never learned their WWII lessons

I work for a German bank in the US…
and after 1.5 yrs of complaining to HR about discrimination they left me with no choice than to file an EEOC charge

at least this article explains why the only German women I’ve come across at work are secretaries

but it also validates why I need to sue them
————————–

if foreign nationals want to do business in the United States — they must follow our laws…

and foreigners here on work visas who violate our laws should get their visas pulled automatically

this is the only way they will learn

and stop them from exporting their discriminatory practices and beliefs to US soil

Berlin, Germany
January 19th, 2010
3:20 pm

“In late 2001, an O.E.C.D. study of literacy skills of 15-year-olds stunned Germany by ranking it 21st out of 27 and among the last in terms of social mobility, even though it has Europe’s largest economy.”

Have you considered in your statistic including the correlation of the un-intergratable – and unwilling to – Muslim invasion of EUrabia in this statistic?… Sadly here the socially, linguistically and culturally clueless [and often illiterate Anatolian] mothers CAN NOT pass anything on to their kids except the latest hate blast from the Imams that are ceaseless on the TV these women have as there only outlet, since most are not permitted out of the house alone. Germany has an absurd law allowing the presence of TV antennas where ever…

.

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

January 18, 2010
The Female Factor

In Germany, a Tradition Falls, and Women Rise

By KATRIN BENNHOLD

NEUÖTTING, GERMANY — Manuela Maier was branded a bad mother. A Rabenmutter, or raven mother, after the black bird that pushes chicks out of the nest. She was ostracized by other mothers, berated by neighbors and family, and screamed at in a local store.

Her crime? Signing up her 9-year-old son when the local primary school first offered lunch and afternoon classes last autumn — and returning to work.

“I was told: ‘Why do you have children if you can’t take care of them?”’ said Ms. Maier, 47. By comparison, having a first son out of wedlock 21 years ago raised few eyebrows in this traditional Bavarian town, she said.

Ten years into the 21st century, most schools in Germany still end at lunchtime, a tradition that dates back nearly 250 years. That has powerfully sustained the housewife/mother image of German lore and was long credited with producing well-bred, well-read burghers.

Modern Germany may be run by a woman — Chancellor Angela Merkel, routinely called the world’s most powerful female politician — but it seems no coincidence that she is childless.

Across the developed world, a combination of the effects of birth control, social change, political progress and economic necessity has produced a tipping point: numerically, women now match or overtake men in the work force and in education.

In the developing world, too, the striving of women and girls for schooling, small loans and status is part of another immense upheaval: the rise of nations in Asia, Africa and Latin America.

In both these worlds, women can remain trapped by tradition. Now, a social revolution — peaceful, but profound — is driving a search for new ways of combining family life and motherhood with a more powerful role for women.

Westerners are quick to denounce customs in, say, the Muslim world that they perceive as limiting women. But in Germany, despite its vaunted modernity, a traditional perception of motherhood lingers.

The half-day school system survived feudalism, the rise and demise of Hitler’s mother cult, the women’s movement of the 1970s and reunification with East Germany.

Now, in the face of economic necessity, it is crumbling: one of the lowest birthrates in the world, the specter of labor shortages and slipping education standards have prompted a rethink. Since 2003, nearly a fifth of Germany’s 40,000 schools have phased in afternoon programs, and more plan to follow suit.

“This is a taboo we just can’t afford anymore; the country needs women to be able to both work and have children,” said Ursula von der Leyen, the German labor minister. A mother of seven and doctor-turned-politician, she baffles housewives and childless career women alike, not to mention many men in her Christian Democratic Union.

The spread of all-day schooling in Germany, a trend she considers “irreversible,” is a sign of the times, Ms. von der Leyen said in an interview. “The 21st century belongs to women.”

Women already form the majority of university graduates in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which groups 30 nations from Europe to the United States to Turkey and South Korea; this year, women will become the majority of the American work force.

Add to that an economic crisis that has hurt traditional male jobs in manufacturing harder than female ones in services — in Germany, only 10,000 of the 230,000 who have lost jobs in the slump were women — and the female factor emerges as stark.

Everywhere, women still earn less, are more likely to work part time and less likely to hold top jobs. But young female doctors, for instance, are rising in numbers, and women dominate middle management in major consumer companies. They could run the hospitals and corporations of tomorrow. Many will be family breadwinners; in Germany, every fifth household is already sustained by female income.

Working women seek not just a paycheck, but also fulfillment of ambitions, both personal and professional. “I love my son, and I love my work,” said Manuela Schwesig, 35, the new deputy leader of the opposition Social Democrats, who is the mother of a 3-year-old. “I am a more fulfilled mother for working and a more motivated politician for having a child.”

This trend turns the question of child care into one of economic competitiveness, notes Karen Hagemann, professor of European and gender history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “High birthrates and female employment rates tend to move together,” said Ms. Hagemann, an expert on the German care system. “Child care and a school system that covers the working day is key.”

Why Germany is special

In 1763, Prussia was ahead of its time, the first country to make education compulsory for its lower classes. The half-day system evolved in a family economy that depended on child labor. By the time France and Britain set up all-day systems a century later, the German way — which survives in Austria and parts of Switzerland — had already grown deep roots.

Staunch defenders are not just socially conservative politicians or clerics. Germany’s middle classes long believed that they, not the state, should round out children’s general culture. No school, the thinking went, could improve on a mother.

Edith Brunner, 41, is that German model mother. A qualified tax adviser and who has four children, she went part time after her first child and then gave up work altogether. She spends afternoons checking schoolwork and shuttling from flute and piano lessons to soccer training and gymnastics tournaments. Her husband is a well-paid physicist.

Ms. Brunner’s example provides a strong argument for those opposing all-day school. But her type is increasingly rare.

Today, highly qualified women — and there are more of them than ever — tend to want to work, even if that means forgoing children; by their mid-40s, one in three German women live in childless households, the highest proportion in Europe along with Austria. At the same time, more and more women need to work, either as single mothers or because their partner cannot support a family alone.

Now, said Ms. Schwesig, who is also family minister in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, a northeastern state, the mothers who stay at home are increasingly those with less education and sometimes an immigrant background, those whose children would, in her view, “benefit the most from visiting a childcare facility all day.”

In late 2001, an O.E.C.D. study of literacy skills of 15-year-olds stunned Germany by ranking it 21st out of 27 and among the last in terms of social mobility, even though it has Europe’s largest economy. Two years later, the government, Social Democratic at the time, made available €4 billion, or $5.7 billion, to introduce all-day programs at 10,000 schools by 2009. In the end, some 7,200 schools took part, joining a small existing stock.

Intentionally or not, the mostly male establishment unleashed a long-incipient power: mothers chafing to work who needed longer school hours.

In the rectory next to Neuötting’s 15th-century St. Nicolas Roman Catholic Church, the priest, Florian Wöss, reluctantly accepts the change. His parish runs two kindergartens for children over 3. More mothers have asked him to accept younger children. “I don’t like the fact that more mothers feel they have to hand over their children and go to work,” he said. “But it is a reality.”

Local clergy debated whether to stall the trend by simply refusing, he said. “We came to the conclusion that the pressure is so overwhelming and so multilayered that we can’t stop it.”

Wolfgang Gruber of the Bavarian education authority concurs. He uses words like “flood” and “avalanche” to describe the demand for afternoon schooling. From 2006 to 2009, only 40 primary schools in Bavaria converted. This school year, the number of all-day programs shot to 150. The aim is to introduce afternoon classes in 540 of the 2,300 primary schools, Mr. Gruber said.

Even five years ago, all-day schooling in Neuötting seemed unthinkable, Mayor Peter Haugeneder said. There is a crucifix in his office, in every classroom of the Max Fellermeier school and even in the Spanish-themed restaurant run by the gay butcher.

For several mothers, their great-grandmothers’ maxim, “Kinder, Küche, Kirche” — children, kitchen, church — holds true, even if, as Mr. Haugeneder says, “increasingly it is a way of life people can’t afford.”

A caregiver for the elderly, Ms. Maier works in a female-dominated growth sector in aging Germany. Without the €800 she contributes to the family income of €2,400 every month, the Maiers could not run the two cars they depend on in the countryside. She jumped at the chance of afternoon school.

Ms. Maier still frowns when recalling the day last October when she was choosing a new washing machine. The mother of one of her son’s friends appeared from nowhere, shouting insults.

Soon, however, sneers turned to sheepish questions about her son’s exciting afternoon activities. Several parents tried to sign up midterm — but the program was already oversubscribed. The school plans one extra all-day class a year through 2012, according to the deputy headmaster, Anton Schatz.

Even the angry mother from the store has become quite friendly, Ms. Maier says: “I wouldn’t be surprised if she enrolls her own son next year.”

An East-West divide

For four decades after World War II, Germany was divided into East and West, now rendering it a social laboratory to study how basics, like school hours, can help shape attitudes.

In the East, a Communist leadership losing male labor to the West set up free day care centers and all-day schools. Women drove cranes and studied physics. Western wives, by contrast, until 1977 officially needed husbands’ permission to work. By then, their Eastern peers had a year of paid maternity leave and shorter work hours if they nursed.

When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, female employment in the East was near 90 percent, in the West 55 percent.

Today, 66 percent of German women work. But for those with children under 3, that figure plunges to 32 percent. Only 14 percent of women with one child resume full-time work and only 6 percent of those with two. One result: a birthrate of 1.38 children per woman.

Jana Seipold was an 18-year-old East Berliner when the wall fell. Her mother always worked and put her into day care at eight weeks. When Ms. Seipold’s company was swallowed by a Western rival, she met West German women for the first time. “When they had children, they would just disappear,” Ms. Seipold, a 38-year-old computer technician, recalls.

Her daughters, Nele, 6, and Ella, 9, attend the Sonnenblumen Grundschule in Treptow, a district in eastern Berlin. Beyond school hours, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., the school offers child care from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. Monday to Friday and care during school holidays. Berlin is the only city in Germany where every primary school offers afternoon schooling.

In general, the child care infrastructure remains much more developed in the former East: 37 percent of under-3-year-olds have nursery places, compared with 3 percent in the former West.

Such amenities lure Western families like Urte Dally and her husband, Ortwin, who moved to eastern Berlin in 1994 and found it “liberating.” Their daughters also attend the Treptow school.

Ms. Dally could afford not to work. Her husband is general secretary of the German Archaeological Institute. But like him, she has a Ph.D. and loves her job at a museum in Saxony. When they travel or work late, they have a nanny, Günther.

“When the girls come home the homework is done, they’ve had their music lessons and they’ve done their practice,” Ms. Dally said. “That leaves quality time for the family.”

What policy can fashion

For too long, says Ms. von der Leyen, social policy in West Germany was hampered by ideology. “Day care and all-day schools were long synonymous with communism,” she said. “But other countries tell the same story.”

In Europe, Nordic countries have the biggest share of women in the labor market and also, with France, high birthrates. All offer a continuum of support for parents with young children from subsidized care and paid parental leave to all-day schools with off-hour programs, Willem Adema of the O.E.C.D. said.

American mothers do not have the same subsidized child care options, and must cope with the long U.S. summer school break. But they face less discrimination at work and more pressure to earn money to finance private health care and education for their offspring.

As family minister in Ms. Merkel’s first term, Ms. von der Leyen introduced tax credits for private child care, more nursery places and her signature measure, “parent money.” Mothers and fathers can share up to 14 months of generously paid parental leave. If the father does not take at least two months, the government pays for only 12.

Her aim was to give incentive to women to forgo part of the permitted, barely paid three-year maternity leave, often seen as an impediment to a career, and to encourage men to share in child care.

Before the parent money was introduced in 2007, only about 3 percent of fathers took parental leave. By last year, that had surged to 21 percent — although some 60 percent took only the minimum two months.

What business can do

At Siemens, the 163-year-old industrial symbol of Germany Inc., it was long unknown for a man to take time off for children. Then in 2008, 638 employees took the “father months.” Last year, 964 followed suit.

Jill Lee, the company’s first chief diversity officer, cares about fathers. She thinks if career breaks become less of a female exception, it helps women.

Ms. Lee, 46, grew up in Singapore and has worked with American, Chinese and Japanese companies. She has never seen anything like what German mothers face. “Some of the same parents who encourage their daughters to go to university then expect them to leave work to care for her child,” she said.

Having women — now more than half of German university graduates — out of the work force is beginning to hurt. By 2017, demographers predict a shortfall of 200,000 engineers in Germany, Ms. Lee says.

So Siemens is courting women, and mothers. It has 400 places for employees’ children in day care centers near production sites and plans to double that figure by next year. It has a high school science camp for bright female mathematics and physics students and mentors female undergraduates. In Germany, 21 percent of Siemens’s staff is female; among new recruits, 34 percent.

What remains hazy is how many women will make it to the top echelons, and how fast. In Germany, only 13 percent of university professors are women. Siemens is the only one of the top 30 German companies with a woman on its eight-person management board: Barbara Kux, 55, who is unmarried and childless. Only 2 percent of those running Fortune 500 companies are women.

And, if women’s advancement to date has been accepted by men, might conflict loom as calls for next steps — boardroom quotas or mandatory paternity leave — grow louder?

“Many obstacles remain, and a backlash is always possible,” said Ms. Hagemann, the history professor in North Carolina. But, in Germany and elsewhere, once unthinkable notions are now being entertained. “All change,” she said, requires “a change in the head.”

Ab der 8. Minute verbreitet H. Bohm hier wieder die beliebte These des Misstrauens der deutschen Kulturelite aufgrund des Mißbrauchs der Emotionen durch die Nazis. Die Gruppe 47 habe den emotional-erzählerischen Gestus gar nicht erst zugelassen. Dies schlichtweg deshalb, weil Wertordnungen durch Emotionen propagiert würden und nicht durch Argumente.

Ich höre diese These immer wieder. Und staune, wie einhellig sie verbreitet wird. Generell macht es mich stutzig, wenn in Deutschland zu irgendeiner Sache die Meinungen einhellig sind. Man ist jedoch einhellig der Meinung rationale Argumente stehen über den Emotionen, als wäre beides voneinander trennbar, das nur nebenbei.

Gerade die Nazis haben sich in einem Maße der Wisschenschaft und der Argumente bedient, haben erfolgreiche Akademiker auf ihre Seite gezogen, damit sie mit ARGUMENTEN ihre “Thesen”stützen. Gerade heute schrieb die FAZ von der akademischen Hinwendung zur 2. Schuld, der Aufarbeitung  des Nazionalsozialismus… Bezeichnenderweise war der Artikel mit “Menschlicher Sumpf” übertitelt. Argumente können ebenso dienlich sein und dienen wie Emotionen, wenn es um Manipulation von Menschen geht. Beides kann missbraucht werden und im Kern “unwahr” sein.

Dieser seltsame Rückschlüss zu Ungunsten der Emotionen, diese Unterscheidung und Verdammung der emotionalen Seite aufgrund des Nationalsozialismus ist ein Phänomen innderhalb der Kulturelite, das ich schon länger nachzuvollziehen versuche. Es gelingt mir nicht, gerade rational argumentierende Menschen argumentieren damit, dass man argumentativ nie das Übel herbeizitieren könnte. Dass jedoch in zahllosen Konflikten dieser Welt, gerade Argumentationen der Provokation von Emotionen dienen, die den Herrschenden dienlich sind, scheint kein Widerspruch. Weiter wir behauptet, dass solche Argumente nicht rational seien, und wie erklären sie sich dann jedoch, dass führende deutsche DENKER diesen ARGUMENTEN verfallen sind. Selbst Hannah Arend, eine Denkerin mit deren kritischem Verstand man sich gerne schmückt, wird im anglo-amerikansichen Raum zunehmend kritisch betrachtet hinischtlich ihrer ARGUMENTE:

“Wasserstein concludes that her use of these sources was “more than a methodological error: it was symptomatic of a perverse world-view contaminated by over-exposure to the discourse of collective contempt and stigmatization that formed the object of her study”—that object being anti-Semitism. In other words, he contends, Arendt internalized the values of the anti-Semitic literature she read in her study of anti-Semitism, at least to a certain extent. Wasserstein’s conjecture will reignite the debate over Arendt’s contemptuous remarks on certain Jews who were victims of Hitler in her Eichmann book and in her letters” (Weiter dazu bitte HIER)

Woher also der irrationale deutsche Rückschluss, Emotionen seien bestechlich  und Argumente nicht?

Über Hark Bohm

About Sir Ken Robinson

Creativity expert Sir Ken Robinson challenges the way we’re educating our children. He champions a radical rethink of our school systems, to cultivate creativity and acknowledge multiple types…

Über Sir Ken Robinson

So, da haben wir sie, die Meister des Feuilletons…. Bitte hier klicken:

http://www.umblaetterer.de/2010/01/12/die-ergebnisse-der-feuilleton-meisterschaft-2009/

Zwei Geister in meiner Brust: Schön, dass wir schöngeistig sind. Schön, dass wir uns dem hehren Geist und den Untiefen von Bildbeschreibungen zuwenden dürfen. Jeder Mensch hat ein Recht auf seine Welt, das ganze deutsche Feuilleton hat ein Recht auf seine Welt…

All dieser Platz. In einem Land, in dem die Medien als Teil der Staatsgewalt gelten. Das Land fährt sich gerade gekonnt gegen die Wand, die größte Krise seit weiß der Himmel… An allem, das unsere Lebensqualität sichert, wird gerüttelt. Ausser bei Broder und Biller spielt diese Aussenwelt kaum eine Rolle, wie auch immer man die Argumentation findet, sie befassen sich mit der Welt, in der sie leben, wenn sie für die Zeitung schreiben… Gut, dass Deutsche allmählich Gelassenheit in Krisenzeiten entwickeln. Doch während man sich in Deutschland in Gelassenheit übt, veranstalter man sogar in Zagreb schon eine Benefizgala für deutsche Schulen in Berlin. Kann diesem Land denn nicht jemand feuilletonistisch mitteilen, dass es sich selbst ruiniert? Die Intelligentsia Deutschlands kriegts jedenfalls nicht mit, sie kommt ja kaum aus den Cafés oder dem Netz oder dem Netzwerken heraus… Schön beschäftigt alle…. Oder, um einen Gedanken von Marlene Steeruwitz aufzugreifen: Das deutsche Theater wird subventioniert, damit die Energie der Kreativen und Politischen ins Leere läuft… So ähnlich verhält es sich wohl auch mit dem Feuilleton. Lieber sinniert  die Intelligentsia tiefsinning für andere 100 Intelligentsia-Leser über die Ästhetik von Buchcovern, über Laptops und Latte in Berlin Mitte, über iPhones, die an der Brustwarze vibrieren… Der Rest der “Elite” mit Hang zu etwas sinnlicherem Arbeiten macht subventioniertes Theater für 3% der Bevölkerung, und die 3 % , die sich die Karten leisten können, verlassen in Anbetracht der subventionierten kreativ-Energie dann ohnehin den Saal… Kulturbetrieb…

P.S.:

Es gab eine Zeit, da musste man die Arbeiterklasse noch vor der Vereinnahmung ihrer Lebenswirklichkeit vor der Intelligentsia in Schutz nehmen. Da könnte man sagen, ganz gleich, wie man´s macht, es ist nie recht… Nachzulesen in einem ZEIT Artikel von 1965

“We’re already hearing a hue and cry from Wall Street suggesting that this proposed fee is not only unwelcome but unfair, that by some twisted logic it is more appropriate for the American people to bear the cost of the bailout rather than the industry that benefited from it, even though these executives are out there giving themselves huge bonuses.”

Mr. Obama continued, “What I say to these executives is this: Instead of sending a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I suggest you might want to consider simply meeting your responsibilities.”

Link zur New York Times. Ulrich Maurer dürfte erfreut sein.

Ein Mann mit Augen wie Terence Hill. Doch strahlendes Stahblau erschwert immer auch den Blick hinein: So wirkt Ulrich Maurer bei seinem gestrigen Vortrag in der Neuen Uni Heidelberg verbal transparent und dennoch persönlich undurchsichtig. Er erklärt Sachverhalte und sein Anliegen mit ruhiger, klarer Stimme. Er redet frei, führt am liebsten Anekdoten an, die durchaus einem nachvollziehbaren roten Faden folgen und sich zu so etwas wie einer Argumentation schliessen…

Die Gäste der Heidelberger Linken sind leider eine bedenkliche Vistitenkarte für die Partei, denn statt sich dem Redner zuzuwenden, sind sind abgelenkt durch Nebengeschehnisse im Saal. Bei Meinungsverschiedenheiten verabschiedet man sich schon mal mit Arschloch, was jedoch nur für die Authentiziät der Partei spricht.  Diese offensichtliche Kluft zwischen Basis und Spitze ist für einen parteifremden Besucher durchaus ein Problem, nicht zuletzt ein Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem. Weiss der Vortragende, dass er hier nur Händeschütteln soll, dass er reicht, die Mächtigen zu denunzieren, um Schlagwort-Applaus zu erhalten? Weiss er, dass er nur hier und da einen kleinen Aggessionsschub austarieren muss, und die Sympathien sind ihm sicher?

Gefasste, kluge Menschen sind mit lieber, wenn sie von gefassten, klugen Menschen umgeben sind. Gestern abend hingegen: Während Ulrich Maurer frustrierende, korrupute Zusammespiele von Wirtschaft, Presse und Politik in Deutschland mit Haltung referiert, sich hier und da in einen sympathischen moralischen Zynismus gegenüber den Mächtigen (, zu denen er sich ja zählen lassen muss,) flüchtet, regen sich seine Zuhörer über dieses und jenes auf, vor allem jedoch über ihre zu lauten Sitznachbarn oder die unbequemen Sitzbänke… Beleuchtet man diesen Abend im Hinblick darauf, wie in einem demokratischen Land so ungestört sanfte Korruption betrieben werden kann, erhielte man folgende Erkennttnis: Viele System-Kritiker können bereits den kleinsten Alltagshindernissen nur mittels großer Aggressionsanfälle entgegnen. Auf Psychologendeutsch hiesse das: Die Frustrationstoleranz ist sehr gering.

Wie man mit solchen Menschen ein Land von der Basis aus demokratisch gestalten soll, ist eine Frage, die ich Herrn Maurer, der mit seiner Scharfsichtigkeit auch darüber nachgedacht haben wird, gerne gestellt hätte. Denn die Kluft zwischen Maurers idealem Staat, der sich durch eigenverantwortliche, kommunale, demokratische Verwaltung mit und für Bürgern  kennzeichnet, und den Genossen dieses Abens, die offensichtlich schon mit der Verlegung des Hörsals ausgelastet sind, wirft Fragen auf, die man ihm stellen sollte.

Ulrich Mauerers Gedanken sind jedoch bedenkenswert. Wenn auch nicht erheiternd. Wer etwas genauer hinsehen möchte, der nehme sich eine halbe Stunde und sehe sich dieses gute Intereview an. Hier scheint auch der Einblick hinter das Stahlblau für Sekunden möglich, vielleicht stimmte gestern einfach das Setting nicht …

“Fröhlicher Trotz, das begeistert mich…” (Ulrich Maurer in diesem Interview)

Ulrich Maurer über die Verschleuderung von Staatsvermögen

Link zur Homepage der Veranstalter

Homepage von Ulrich Maurer

Ein Blick zu “den Großen”: Hier eine Liste der Versuche der Regierung Obama, Korruption transparenter zu machen.

About Randy Pausch

About Robert Sapolsky

Ältere Artikel »